Skip to content
ToolShelf

Zakat on pension calculator

See what zakat your pension attracts under each of the positions held on it, from a pot you can access to one locked until retirement.

What kind of pension

Scheme

Can you reach it?

Access
How a locked pot is treated

Both readings are held, and the difference between them is decades of payments, so it is asked rather than assumed.

The figures

The fund value on the day your zakat year closes

What is assessed

Cash, so it is assessed however the pot itself is treated

Nisab threshold

Measured against

Today's market price where you are

Add the current silver price and the threshold appears here. Without it there is nothing to test your wealth against, so no figure is shown rather than one assumed.

Zakat on your pension

Enter your pot value, or pension income you are holding, and the position appears here.

Why this one has no single answer

Zakat is due on wealth you own and can dispose of. A pension is wealth you own in some sense and frequently cannot touch for decades. Everything difficult about this question follows from that tension, and the sources do not settle it, which is why this tool lays out the positions and works out what each gives, rather than producing one number and calling it the answer.

The general zakat calculator says in its own notes that it does not rule on pensions. This tool does not rule either. It makes the choice visible and shows you its consequence.

Is there a pot at all?

A defined-contribution pension, most workplace and personal schemes, has a balance with your name on it. A defined-benefit or final-salary pension does not: it is a promise that the scheme will pay you an income, and there is no capital sum you hold. The common position is that nothing is due until the payments arrive, and this tool will not invent a value for one.

A transfer value quoted by such a scheme is what it would cost to buy you out. It is not wealth sitting in your name.

Can you reach it?

Where you could withdraw the money now, even at a penalty or a tax charge. It is widely treated as ordinary wealth from that point. A cost is a reason not to withdraw, not a barrier to ownership.

Where it is genuinely locked, the readings part company. One says the wealth is yours regardless and zakat runs annually on its value. The other says zakat attaches to wealth you can actually dispose of, so nothing is due until you receive it. Over a working life the difference is decades of payments, which is far too large to settle with a default.

The whole fund, or part of it?

The same question that arises with shares arises here: some hold that zakat falls only on the zakatable portion of what the fund is invested in, rather than on the whole value. That proportion depends entirely on the fund’s holdings and must come from its own published figures. As elsewhere on this site, no default is supplied, because any single figure would be wrong for most funds.

The tax question

Whether you may deduct the tax that will fall due on withdrawal is raised constantly and has no settled method, so this tool offers no field for it. One argument says you will never receive that portion; the other says the tax is a future liability while zakat is assessed on what you hold now. Both deserve better than a calculator picking one.

Contributions that are not yours yet

Employer contributions subject to a vesting period you have not completed are generally reasoned not to be your wealth until they vest. Your own contributions always are. A scheme statement will usually show the split.

Questions

Do I pay zakat on a pension I cannot touch for thirty years?
This is the question, and it does not have one settled answer. One reading holds that the wealth is yours whether or not you can reach it, so zakat runs annually on its value, the cautious course. Another holds that zakat is on wealth you can dispose of, so nothing is due while it is locked and it begins once the money is received. Both are held by people qualified to hold them, which is why the tool asks rather than choosing.
What if I could withdraw it, but only at a penalty?
Being able to access it at a cost is generally treated as being able to access it. From that point most treat the pot as ordinary wealth. The penalty is a reason not to withdraw, not a barrier to ownership.
I have a final salary pension. What is its value?
For zakat purposes, arguably nothing yet. A defined-benefit or final-salary scheme is a promise of future income rather than a pot you own, so there is no capital sum to assess. The common position is that zakat begins on the payments once they are received. Transfer values quoted by the scheme are what it would cost to buy you out, not wealth you hold.
Should I pay on the whole fund value or part of it?
The same question arises as with shares. Some hold zakat falls only on the zakatable portion of what the fund is invested in, its cash, receivables and stock, rather than on property and plant. That proportion has to come from the fund's own figures; no default is offered here, because a single number would be wrong for most funds.
Can I deduct the tax I will pay when I withdraw?
It is raised often and there is no settled method, so the tool offers no field for it. The argument for is that you will never receive that portion; the argument against is that the tax is a future liability rather than a present one, and zakat is assessed on what you hold now. If it matters to your situation, ask someone qualified rather than picking whichever answer is cheaper.
What about employer contributions that have not vested?
Where contributions are not yet yours, subject to a vesting period you have not completed. The usual reasoning is that you do not own them, so they are not part of your wealth. Once vested they are. Your scheme statement should show which is which.

More tools